“When Corpus Christi state representative Vilma Luna decided to give up her legislative seat in July to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners, the Democratic party had every reason to believe that the seat would remain in the party's column.”
Let’s look a little further into this assertion.
Why did Vilma Luna step down?
One answer and the one on the surface would be as stated, “to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners”. Vilma cited more family time as her primary reason. It goes much deeper than that Mr. Burka; remember Vilma Luna is their hero. It is not difficult to understand that the Utility of Vilma Luna was wearing thin like the Firestone tires that made Mikal and his Crew rich. He could have eventually got her into something she will be blamed for. As it is common knowledge in South Texas; Mikal Watts is about reversing the “Capelo” legislation. There were two tort reform bills, one originated by doctors (and endorsed by TLR) that capped non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000 and another containing an assortment of protections for businesses, supported by TLR.
“The Republicans had not fielded a candidate against her in the general election, nor did they challenge her in 2004. Luna's last contested race had come in 2002, when she defeated Republican Lauro Cuellar with 66 percent of the vote.”
WATT kind of Republican Party is this? They would not attempt to challenge the issues and compete? To field and financially support a Republican opponent; is it in the Republican Leader’s eyes, to throw money into a losing cause? Why not field a candidate to represent the Republican side of the issues. No Cajones! That is the attitude of a loser and a prime example of the afraid to lose mentality. Why would HD #33 want such a mentality to step in and represent us in Austin?
“But Luna chose to resign her seat rather than to say that she was moving out of the district, and that decision could have far-reaching implications. Had she given as her reason for leaving that she was moving to Austin and would no longer be eligible to serve, the Democratic precinct chairs in the district could have chosen a replacement for her. But the Republicans, having fielded no candidate for the seat in the primary, would have been barred from naming a candidate. Luna's resignation allowed the Republicans to get back in the game and name a challenger.”
It was not Vilma’s reason for resigning that allowed the Republican to loophole a candidate; it was that she resigned after the final filing date and the timing allowed both the Democrats and the Republicans to loophole a candidate. It also prevented the voters from voting for the Democratic & Republican candidates to run in November. Solomon Ortiz Jr. defeated Mr. Noyola in a popular vote for the Nueces County Democratic Chairman in 2002. However, the resignation of Vilma Luna was planned from before the final date to file. This assertion is based on certain court dockets, the targeting and positioning of crucial operatives and pawns so as to gain the leverage to retain a puppet in replacing Luna. Then one opponent (the WATTS supported Candidate) had the inside track and was very informed before Vilma announced her resignation. This is in reference Danny Noyola announcement and committing of precinct chairs.
”Normally, this would not have mattered; the Democratic nominee would have been a heavy favorite.”
HD #33 is predominantly a Democratic District. Solly’s Republican opponent is a likeable guy, but WATT have the Republican’s ever done for the average citizen? WATT has Solomon P Ortiz Jr.’s Republican opponent; even with his resume of bolster, accomplished for the Average Citizen? Anyway, we enjoy the underdog label;….. continue on.
But the process of choosing between controversial candidates from two politically active families split the party.
Sellouts split the party.
WATT did they sell their soul & beliefs for?
Money?
Power?
A title?
The Democratic Party might have some disgruntled leaders but the people are still “Loyal Democrats” when it comes to redistricting and Craddick. The Solomon Ortiz Jr. Campaign defeated Mr WATTS. The Molina bitterness resounds hollow at best.
The winner, selected on August 13, was Solomon Ortiz Jr., 29, whose resume consists mainly of being the son of congressman Solomon Ortiz and a stormy term as Nueces County Democratic chairman.
You know, initially I thought the same thing about Solly, like he was a spoiled brat or silver spoon in his mouth when he was born. Not even close to the man I know and have scrutinized. Solomon’s work ethic is one of the attributes one recognizes from the get go. He is a hard worker. He has been in training to be a public servant all of his life. The Politicos of South Texas have all interacted with Solomon and “have watched him grow up before their eyes”. Solomon’s ideology is not from one Congressman who he calls Dad but from many who have instilled a well-rounded and independent character willing to butt heads and defend when called for. Solomon P Ortiz Jr. (at 29 years young) possesses a proven and established network that will readily respond to him in Austin. This is something he has in Austin that takes years of seniority to develop. This experience is esoteric in nature but is the key ingredient when it comes to the Lege in Austin.
”Meanwhile, the Republican chairs nominated a quality candidate in Joe McComb, the owner of a local moving company, who served for eight years on the city council and another eight years as county commissioner, sandwiched around a losing a race for county judge (a race in which some supporters criticized him for not running an aggressive campaign). He has one of those resumes that goes on forever, including a public policy experience in water and workforce issues, as well as appointments to the State of Texas Community Development Program (by Bush) and the Comptroller's Committee to Oversee Funds of the Texas Tobacco Settlement Permanent Trust Account (by Strayhorn).”
All of that stuff sounds very impressive when one says it fast, but WATT has he done for the Average Citizen. Sounds kind of like “all dressed up and nowhere to go”?
Give that man a title!
Mc Comb's chance to do the same (win the election) depends upon whether young Ortiz can make peace with and win the support of the bitterly disappointed Noyola forces.
This will not happen. Solomon does not need the small contribution to win. Solomon envisions and works toward the goal of returning unification and solidarity to the Nueces Democratic Party.
“Right now it doesn't look good for Ortiz. An article on the KRIS-TV Web site quoted Noyola as saying in the immediate aftermath of his defeat, "It's disappointing because there was so much hate coming from the Ortiz camp. It influenced some of our precinct chairs, some of them believed some of that hate. Quite honestly they're the scum of the earth, when they just maliciously, fictitiously, when they just come up with things like that I'm beating up on someone, it's so sad that those people revert to hate, and they're all friends of the Solomon camp."
There were Noyola Haters who just hated the Noyolas. Solomon supporters were not the hater element. Also, one must realize both sides catered to the precinct chairs to win their vote. The methodology is night and day. Those are words of a sore loser.
At stake is not just the Republican-Democrat balance in the House (currently 86R, 64D) but also the level of support for Speaker Tom Craddick. Luna was an avid Craddick supporter. The coalition of most House Democrats and a handful of Republicans, all of whom dream of unseating him, were counting on Luna's replacement to join the “Anybody but Craddick” ranks. Now that outcome is by no
Redistricting is one reason the Democrats will stick together and vote for Solomon. But the main reason we will stick together and vote for Solomon P. Ortiz Jr. in November is because everybody in South Texas loathes Craddick and Solly’s opponent will definitely join the “Craddick Ranks” and become an a avid Craddick supporter.
5 comments:
Burka couldn’t have written a more unbiased word about the District 33 race than he did in this blog entry. As expected, the "Chisme Vatos" wasted no time in spewing their usual venomous rhetoric of hate, racism, and utter lack of respect for the facts. I’m not sure how one is supposed to have an intelligent conversation with these guys...but maybe a bit of intelligence is asking too much. The race for "Camp Sol" is not about (as they would like you to believe) "mi amigos", it’s about sticking it to the other side (whomever that may be at the moment) as much as possible. They have their heads so far up their collective posteriors over individuals like Mikal Watts they are, have been, and will continue to miss the point...the race is about how to best represent the greater populous, not how best to beat down a singular member of it. Burka’s responses to the comments were just as well thought out and dead-on-the-money as his original post. Thanks Paul, for having the gusto to come back and stand up to the ill-informed.
JK:Burka did not post my response which is quite the contrary to the picture you paint.
Put it out there and show everybody WATT Solly has behind him.
These guys are loyal to Solly but they are so used to fighting the old way. It is a new day for South Texas. We expect substance to represent our candidates not unsupported rhetoric in defense of a man who needs not to be defended but understood.
The article I present is in example of the support and assets we bring to the table.
Go for it Burka, post the article?
Burka: "When Corpus Christi state representative Vilma Luna decided to give up her legislative seat in July to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners, the Democratic party had every reason to believe that the seat would remain in the party's column."
JK: Let's look a little further into this assertion.
Why did Vilma Luna step down? One answer and the one on the surface would be as stated, "to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners". Vilma cited more family time as her primary reason. It goes much deeper than that Mr. Burka; remember
It is not difficult to understand that the Utility of Vilma Lunawas wearing thin like the Firestone tires that made Mikal and his Crew rich. He could have eventually got her into something she will be blamed for. As it is common knowledge in South Texas; Mikal Watts is about reversing the "Capelo" legislation. There were two tort reform bills, one originated by doctors (and endorsed by TLR that capped non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000 and another containing an assortment of protections for businesses, supported by TLR Burka: "The Republicans had not fielded a candidate against her in the general election, nor did they challenge her in 2004. Luna's last contested race had come in 2002, when she defeated Republican Lauro Cuellar with 66 percent of the vote.">
JK: WATT kind of Republican Party is this? They would not attempt to challenge the issues and compete? To field and financially support a Republican opponent; is it in the Republican Leader's eyes, to throw money into a losing cause? Why not field a candidate to represent the Republican side of the issues. No Cajones! That is the attitude of a loser and a prime example of the afraid to lose mentality. Why would HD #33 want such a mentality to step in and represent us in Austin?
Burka: "But Luna chose to resign her seat rather than to say that she was moving out of the district, and that decision could have far-reaching implications. Had she given as her reason for leaving that she was moving to Austin and would no longer be eligible to serve, the Democratic precinct chairs in the district could have chosen a replacement for her. But the Republicans, having fielded no candidate for the seat in the primary, would have been barred from naming a candidate. Luna's resignation allowed the Republicans to get back in the game and name a challenger."
JK: It was not Vilma's reason for resigning that allowed the Republican to loophole a candidate; it was that she resigned after the final filing date and the timing allowed both the Democrats and the Republicans to loophole a candidate. It also prevented the voters from voting for the Democratic & Republican candidates to run in November. Solomon Ortiz Jr. defeated Mr. Noyola in a popular vote for the Nueces County Democratic Chairman in 2002. However, the resignation of Vilma Luna was planned from before the final date to file. This assertion is based on certain court dockets, the targeting and positioning of crucial operatives and pawns so as to gain the leverage to retain a puppet in replacing Luna. Then one opponent (the WATTS supported Candidate) had the inside track and was very informed before Vilma announced her resignation. This is in reference Danny Noyola announcement and committing of precinct chairs.
Burka: Normally, this would not have mattered; the Democratic nominee would have been a heavy favorite."
JK: HD #33 is predominantly a Democratic District. Solly's Republican opponent is a likeable guy, but WATT have the Republican's ever done for the average citizen? WATT has Solomon P Ortiz Jr.'s Republican opponent; even with his resume of bolster, accomplished for the Average Citizen? Anyway, we enjoy the underdog label;….. continue on. But the process of choosing between controversial candidates from two politically active families split the party.
JK: Sellouts split the party.
WATT did they sell their soul & beliefs for?
Money?
Power?
The Democratic Party might have some disgruntled leaders but the people are still "Loyal Democrats" when it comes to redistricting and Craddick . The Solomon Ortiz Jr. Campaign defeated Mr WATTS. The Molina bitterness resounds hollow at best.
Burka: The winner, selected on August 13, was Solomon Ortiz Jr., 29, whose resume consists mainly of being the son of congressman Solomon Ortiz and a stormy term as Nueces County Democratic chairman.
JK: You know, initially I thought the same thing about Solly, like he was a spoiled brat or silver spoon in his mouth when he was born. Not even close to the man I know and have scrutinized. Solomon's work ethic is one of the attributes one recognizes from the get go. He is a hard worker. He has been in training to be a public servant all of his life. The Politicos of South Texas have all interacted with Solomon and "have watched him grow up before their eyes". Solomon's ideology is not from one Congressman who he calls Dad but from many who have instilled a well-rounded and independent character willing to butt heads and defend when called for. Solomon P Ortiz Jr. (at 29 years young) possesses a proven and established network that will readily respond to him in Austin. This is something he has in Austin that takes years of seniority to develop. This experience is esoteric in nature but is the key ingredient when it comes to the Lege in Austin.
Burka: "Meanwhile, the Republican chairs nominated a quality candidate in Joe McComb, the owner of a local moving company, who served for eight years on the city council and another eight years as county commissioner, sandwiched around a losing a race for county judge (a race in which some supporters criticized him for not running an aggressive campaign). He has one of those resumes that goes on forever, including a public policy experience in water and workforce issues, as well as appointments to the State of Texas Community Development Program (by Bush) and the Comptroller's Committee to Oversee Funds of the Texas Tobacco Settlement Permanent Trust Account (by Strayhorn).
JK: All of that stuff sounds very impressive when one says it fast, but WATT has he done for the Average Citizen. Sounds kind of like "all dressed up and nowhere to go"?
Give that man a title!
Burka: Mc Comb's chance to do the same (win the election) depends upon whether young Ortiz can make peace with and win the support of the bitterly disappointed Noyola forces.
JK: This will not happen. Solomon does not need the small contribution to win. Solomon envisions and works toward the goal of returning unification and solidarity to the Nueces Democratic Party.
Burka: "Right now it doesn't look good for Ortiz. An article on the KRIS-TV Web site quoted Noyola as saying in the immediate aftermath of his defeat, "It's disappointing because there was so much hate coming from the Ortiz camp. It influenced some of our precinct chairs, some of them believed some of that hate. Quite honestly they're the scum of the earth, when they just maliciously, fictitiously, when they just come up with things like that I'm beating up on someone, it's so sad that those people revert to hate, and they're all friends of the Solomon camp."
JK: There were Noyola Haters who just hated the Noyolas. Solomon supporters were not the hater element. Also, one must realize both sides catered to the precinct chairs to win their vote. The methodology is night and day. Those are words of a sore loser.
Burka: At stake is not just the Republican-Democrat balance in the House (currently 86R, 64D) but also the level of support for Speaker Tom Craddick. Luna was an avid Craddick supporter. The coalition of most House Democrats and a handful of Republicans, all of whom dream of unseating him, were counting on Luna's replacement to join the "Anybody but Craddick" ranks. Now that outcome is by no means .....
JK: Redistricting is one reason the Democrats will stick together and vote for Solomon. But the main reason we will stick together and vote for Solomon P. Ortiz Jr. in November is because everybody in South Texas loathes Craddick and Solly's opponent will definitely join the "Craddick Ranks" and become an a avid Craddick supporter.
--
Posted by Jaime Kenedeño to Texas State Representative House District 33 at 8/22/2006 03:30:00 AM
--
Kenedeno & Associates
Anonymous said...
Seems to me you fail to give Ortiz Jr. the credit he deserves. His tenure as county chair in Nueces was characterized by successful fundraising and winning elections. His campaign thus far has shown a willingness to reach out, bridge differences and look for common ground. Nothing against Noyola or McComb. But Ortiz Jr. is clearly the face of the future in Corpus Christi.
9:43 AM
Ta1999 said...
Anyone who knows the Noyola group in Corpus knows that they are not the force you claim them to be.
I fear that you give them much credit to only make the race look closer than it really is.
10:25 AM
Shutthefuckuploudobbs said...
Paul...Dude, I don't know who you're getting your information from, but you are way, way off course on this one. Let me guess...you've been talking to either Mikal Watts, Jeff Montgomery, or Hugo Berlanga. That's funny!
3:09 PM
Anonymous said...
Yeah! What shutthefuckuploudobbs said! Twice! Jeff Montgomery? He won a race... let's see, sometime in the Eighties?
4:46 PM
politicalpulse said...
Paul, being that you are a republican, I can understand why you intentionally have your facts wrong. You Republicans loved Luna because she in favor of the illegal texas redistricting. Solomon Otiz is a true democrat and not a DINO like Vilma. Thats why the republican party never ran anyone lately against Vilma and that why your upset with Solomons Victory.
7:55 PM
Anonymous said...
Lies, Lies, f...lies. you suck, Burka.
8:56 PM
Anonymous said...
We will crush the neanderthals in Nueces this fall. I don't think you lie, Burka just a bit delusional. Can I offer you a one way ticket to Boulder to get the rest of your brain back from John Mark Karr?
9:26 PM
dannoynted1
dannoynted1 said...
i dont think burka is from around these parts so it's no wonder his brain got lost on the plame game!
mr. burka,
there are a group of people who no matter watt "hate the noyolas" why? i am quite sure God knows but i haven't the foggiest.
it matters not who it is they are running against this group goes out of their way to TLR the "noyolas"
perhaps you could ask the noyolas themselves why they have foes so committed to insuring they never get elected?
1:17 AM
Delete
Paul Burka said...
This is a pretty sorry bunch of comments--just a series of rants. If the Ortiz crowd thinks that a split in the Democratic ranks is not a problem, fine, let them think so. Noyola should never have run. He had way too much baggage and a history of losing elections. But he did run, and he is mad, and he does have followers and the Ortizes do have enemies. Ortiz Jr. is the favorite, but he had better be a very good politician. Winning a 23-20 vote of the precinct chairs, no doubt with a lot of help from his father the congressman, is not an overly impressive showing. The last partisan race in this district, in 2002, resulted in Luna's getting almost exactly 2/3 of the vote. That means McComb's base is 1/3. If he can pick up 25% of the Democratic vote as a result of enmities old and new, the race is a dead heat.
If I approached this story with a prejudice, it is not R vs. D but rather a long-held concern about South Texas style machine politics. Ortiz Sr. is a very successful politician and a force to be reckoned with in bringing home the bacon for military projects, but he has a history of injecting himself into local races (including a recent sheriff's race that the Ortiz-backed candidate lost).
A word about Vilma Luna: To call her a Republican is ridiculous. That sort of thinking is what (self)-destroyed the Democratic party in this state. The liberal Ds spent thirty years (fifties through the seventies) trying to drive conservatives out of the party, and when they finally succeeded, there was nothing left of the party. The Ds can only regain power in this state by attracting moderate conservatives, just as the Rs could only win by attracting moderate Ds. Luna supported Tom Craddick. That does not make her a Republican. Almost all major votes in the House followed party lines (which Republicans were more likely to cross than Democrats), so she clearly had a Democratic voting record. One ranter referred to her vote for the illegal Texas redistricting, which, of course, was found to be legal by the Supreme Court on all points except for one district. She worked hard and with some success on the Appropriations committee for education and health care issues that benefited Democratic constituencies. The Ds shunned her and the Rs, other than Craddick, never accepted her, so she was a woman without a country, a bed she made for herself. Goodness knows who she is going to lobby, except for Craddick himself.
6:04 AM
Anonymous said...
Paul, I generally agree with many of your comments - a split in the Democratic ranks is problematic, despite perception Luna did a very good job representing her district, and McComb is a good candidate and this district is not a solid D seat.
However, splits in party politics happen all the time, just look at CD 22. I sincerely doubt Mayor Wallace will sit out of the race, despite being angry about not being the nominee. More importantly, you miss one important dynamic in this race - the impact both financial and turnout that the Seaman/Garcia race will have. Outside the Wong/Cohen race this is the number one D opportunity race. You'd hope the Nueces Co D's would figure this out and get over the pettiness
9:02 AM
Anonymous said...
Paul, you are exactly on target regarding why the Democratic party is now a minority in Texas government. Intolerance comes in many forms, doesn't it?
3:03 PM
Anonymous said...
Anonymous -
Nice thinking, Of course, Paul "hopes" the D's get their act together. As for me, I'm not quite at "Esther, I'm coming to join you, honey" but I think Paul just said that most of TOM DELAY'S congressional map was held constitutional - not even by fascist judges. I'd never expect him to note that the map had improved perimeter to area scores - i.e. more compact - than its predecessor, but constitutional ? Wow, man.
5:20 PM
Anonymous said...
Democrats running conservatives off ? Yeah, and they took all of their white hoods with them, along with a kick in the a.. The story here should be how the Rs steal elections and power. But we're talking about Burka, right. If 2000 wasn't stolen from African American and elderly Jewish voters, it was stolen by a fascist Supreme Court. The same in Ohio, 2004. Democrats are right to kick red (state) a..h..e Lieberman out. They define themselves by doing so. Not until we equal the R's tactics, lower ourselves to their standard, will we win.
5:37 PM
Anonymous said...
Burka's commentary paints Joe McCombs as more formidable than is the case. McCombs was a county commissioner until 2002 when he lost the county judge race. He was part of a county commissioners court that left the county deeply in debt. McCombs kept the poor finances of the county a secret during the hotly contested race for county judge in 2002. The voters had a right to know what his record had been, but they were kept ignorant of the county finances. When the newly elected Judge Shamsie came in on his first day of work, the judge and the citizens of Nueces County were shocked to learn how much in the red Joe McCombs and the other commissioners had left the county. The new county commissioners and judge started serious budget cutting measures and even were forced to layoff county employees to get the county back in the black. So McCombs has that public record of reckless spending and deceitfulness to account for.
7:22 PM
Paul Burka said...
The anonymous author above has made the case better than I ever could of the fundamental problem facing the Democratic Party. He believes the Democrats are losing because the Republicans steal elections and because the Supreme Court is fascist. As long as Democrats feel this way, they will continue to lose.
I have a good friend who blames the Republican media machine--Fox News, Rush, Ann Coulter--for the Democrats' plight. This is silly. The Republicans aren't winning because Rush and the rest have large media followings; Rush et al have large media followings because the Republicans are winning. This is an era in which conservatism is ascendant.
The election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 triggered a great shift in American politics. Whether
you consider him merely an actor or the successful president he was--the most successful of the postwar era--his election marked the beginning of the end of the Democratic domination of American politics that spanned 1932-1980. In the years leading to Reagan's election, the Republicans poured out new ideas like supply side economics (to name one). Often the ideas were controversial, but think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, the Hoover Institute, the Manhattan Institute, and others enabled the Republicans to grab the intellectual initiative, as the Populists did for the left in 1896 and Berle, Croley, Dewey, Galbraith, and others did in the years leading up to the election of Franklin Roosevelt in 1932 and the long and productive Democratic hegemony that followed.
These great intellectual shifts have occur rarely in American history, and when they do occur, their impact is seismic: One was the rise of Jeffersonianism in 1796-1800 that proved to be the death knell of the Federalists; one was the rise of the Republican party in 1860, which ended America's long debate over slavery and exiled the Democratic party from power for all but a handful of the next 72 years; one was the Great Depression and the subsequent rise of the welfare state in 1932, that exiled Republicans from power; and then Reagan ushered in the cycle we now live in. The current Republican
era has not spent its course. Democrats who blame Bush and Cheney and Rove and the neocons and the talk raio hosts and the Supreme Court miss the point: It's the zeitgeist, stupid.
The Democrats will not return to power until they understand and
accept what has happened to them, just as the Republicans could not
return to power until they accepted the New Deal, as Eisenhower and Nixon
and Reagan did. I don't think the Democrats are close to understanding or accepting. As
long as Democrats believe that Rush and Fox News are fooling the American people, and that the Republicans stole two presidential elections, the Democrats will not be capable of winning. Only when they accept that what the Republicans really stole was the intellectual initiative, and that Democrats have to look to the future rather than whining about the past or the present--or the president--can the Democratic party hope to regain its majority status.
8:48 PM
Anonymous said...
Burka couldn’t have written a more unbiased word about the District 33 race than he did in this blog entry. As expected, the "Chisme Vatos" wasted no time in spewing their usual venomous rhetoric of hate, racism, and utter lack of respect for the facts. I’m not sure how one is supposed to have an intelligent conversation with these guys...but maybe a bit of intelligence is asking too much. The race for "Camp Sol" is not about (as they would like you to believe) "mi amigos", it’s about sticking it to the other side (whomever that may be at the moment) as much as possible. They have their heads so far up their collective posteriors over individuals like Mikal Watts they are, have been, and will continue to miss the point...the race is about how to best represent the greater populous, not how best to beat down a singular member of it. Burka’s responses to the comments were just as well thought out and dead-on-the-money as his original post. Thanks Paul, for having the gusto to come back and stand up to the ill-informed.
12:23 AM
Jaime Kenedeño
Jaime Kenedeño said...
Burka did not post my response which is quite the contrary to the picture you paint.
Put it out there and show everybody WATT Solly has behind him.
These guys are loyal to Solly but they are so used to fighting the old way. It is a new day for South Texas. We expect substance to represent our candidates not unsupported rhetoric in defense of a man who needs not to be defended but understood.
The article I present is in example of the support and assets we bring to the table.
Go for it Burka, post the article?
1:45 AM
Shutthefuckuploudobbs said...
Paul,
Welcome to Nueces County politics! Yes, political discourse gets a little personal, but that is not unusual for this county. If you did not expect these types of comments, then you don't know enough about politics down there to intelligently write about it. Which brings me back to this question...who's feeding you this nonsense?
In the entire history of Democratic politics in Nueces, never has there not been a major rift. It is the norm. To have the Noyola's pissed off is the norm. There is nothing new here. If the Noyola's turned and urged support of a Republican, do you really think they would ever be able to pull D's together in a primary ever again? (the answer is no.)
The only thing I can think of as a reason for your blog is that someone is using you to damage Ortiz's fundraising in Austin.
10:28 AM
Jaime Kenedeño
Jaime Kenedeño said...
Burka: "When Corpus Christi state representative Vilma Luna decided to give up her legislative seat in July to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners, the Democratic party had every reason to believe that the seat would remain in the party's column."
JK: Let's look a little further into this assertion.
Why did Vilma Luna step down? One answer and the one on the surface would be as stated, "to take a lobbying job in Austin with Hillco Partners". Vilma cited more family time as her primary reason. It goes much deeper than that Mr. Burka; remember
It is not difficult to understand that the Utility of Vilma Lunawas wearing thin like the Firestone tires that made Mikal and his Crew rich. He could have eventually got her into something she will be blamed for. As it is common knowledge in South Texas; Mikal Watts is about reversing the "Capelo" legislation. There were two tort reform bills, one originated by doctors (and endorsed by TLR that capped non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases at $250,000 and another containing an assortment of protections for businesses, supported by TLR Burka: "The Republicans had not fielded a candidate against her in the general election, nor did they challenge her in 2004. Luna's last contested race had come in 2002, when she defeated Republican Lauro Cuellar with 66 percent of the vote.">
JK: WATT kind of Republican Party is this? They would not attempt to challenge the issues and compete? To field and financially support a Republican opponent; is it in the Republican Leader's eyes, to throw money into a losing cause? Why not field a candidate to represent the Republican side of the issues. No Cajones! That is the attitude of a loser and a prime example of the afraid to lose mentality. Why would HD #33 want such a mentality to step in and represent us in Austin?
Burka: "But Luna chose to resign her seat rather than to say that she was moving out of the district, and that decision could have far-reaching implications. Had she given as her reason for leaving that she was moving to Austin and would no longer be eligible to serve, the Democratic precinct chairs in the district could have chosen a replacement for her. But the Republicans, having fielded no candidate for the seat in the primary, would have been barred from naming a candidate. Luna's resignation allowed the Republicans to get back in the game and name a challenger."
JK: It was not Vilma's reason for resigning that allowed the Republican to loophole a candidate; it was that she resigned after the final filing date and the timing allowed both the Democrats and the Republicans to loophole a candidate. It also prevented the voters from voting for the Democratic & Republican candidates to run in November. Solomon Ortiz Jr. defeated Mr. Noyola in a popular vote for the Nueces County Democratic Chairman in 2002. However, the resignation of Vilma Luna was planned from before the final date to file. This assertion is based on certain court dockets, the targeting and positioning of crucial operatives and pawns so as to gain the leverage to retain a puppet in replacing Luna. Then one opponent (the WATTS supported Candidate) had the inside track and was very informed before Vilma announced her resignation. This is in reference Danny Noyola announcement and committing of precinct chairs.
Burka: Normally, this would not have mattered; the Democratic nominee would have been a heavy favorite."
JK: HD #33 is predominantly a Democratic District. Solly's Republican opponent is a likeable guy, but WATT have the Republican's ever done for the average citizen? WATT has Solomon P Ortiz Jr.'s Republican opponent; even with his resume of bolster, accomplished for the Average Citizen? Anyway, we enjoy the underdog label;….. continue on. But the process of choosing between controversial candidates from two politically active families split the party.
JK: Sellouts split the party.
WATT did they sell their soul & beliefs for?
Money?
Power?
The Democratic Party might have some disgruntled leaders but the people are still "Loyal Democrats" when it comes to redistricting and Craddick . The Solomon Ortiz Jr. Campaign defeated Mr WATTS. The Molina bitterness resounds hollow at best.
Burka: The winner, selected on August 13, was Solomon Ortiz Jr., 29, whose resume consists mainly of being the son of congressman Solomon Ortiz and a stormy term as Nueces County Democratic chairman.
JK: You know, initially I thought the same thing about Solly, like he was a spoiled brat or silver spoon in his mouth when he was born. Not even close to the man I know and have scrutinized. Solomon's work ethic is one of the attributes one recognizes from the get go. He is a hard worker. He has been in training to be a public servant all of his life. The Politicos of South Texas have all interacted with Solomon and "have watched him grow up before their eyes". Solomon's ideology is not from one Congressman who he calls Dad but from many who have instilled a well-rounded and independent character willing to butt heads and defend when called for. Solomon P Ortiz Jr. (at 29 years young) possesses a proven and established network that will readily respond to him in Austin. This is something he has in Austin that takes years of seniority to develop. This experience is esoteric in nature but is the key ingredient when it comes to the Lege in Austin.
Burka: "Meanwhile, the Republican chairs nominated a quality candidate in Joe McComb, the owner of a local moving company, who served for eight years on the city council and another eight years as county commissioner, sandwiched around a losing a race for county judge (a race in which some supporters criticized him for not running an aggressive campaign). He has one of those resumes that goes on forever, including a public policy experience in water and workforce issues, as well as appointments to the State of Texas Community Development Program (by Bush) and the Comptroller's Committee to Oversee Funds of the Texas Tobacco Settlement Permanent Trust Account (by Strayhorn).
JK: All of that stuff sounds very impressive when one says it fast, but WATT has he done for the Average Citizen. Sounds kind of like "all dressed up and nowhere to go"?
Give that man a title!
Burka: Mc Comb's chance to do the same (win the election) depends upon whether young Ortiz can make peace with and win the support of the bitterly disappointed Noyola forces.
JK: This will not happen. Solomon does not need the small contribution to win. Solomon envisions and works toward the goal of returning unification and solidarity to the Nueces Democratic Party.
Burka: "Right now it doesn't look good for Ortiz. An article on the KRIS-TV Web site quoted Noyola as saying in the immediate aftermath of his defeat, "It's disappointing because there was so much hate coming from the Ortiz camp. It influenced some of our precinct chairs, some of them believed some of that hate. Quite honestly they're the scum of the earth, when they just maliciously, fictitiously, when they just come up with things like that I'm beating up on someone, it's so sad that those people revert to hate, and they're all friends of the Solomon camp."
JK: There were Noyola Haters who just hated the Noyolas. Solomon supporters were not the hater element. Also, one must realize both sides catered to the precinct chairs to win their vote. The methodology is night and day. Those are words of a sore loser.
Burka: At stake is not just the Republican-Democrat balance in the House (currently 86R, 64D) but also the level of support for Speaker Tom Craddick. Luna was an avid Craddick supporter. The coalition of most House Democrats and a handful of Republicans, all of whom dream of unseating him, were counting on Luna's replacement to join the "Anybody but Craddick" ranks. Now that outcome is by no means .....
JK: Redistricting is one reason the Democrats will stick together and vote for Solomon. But the main reason we will stick together and vote for Solomon P. Ortiz Jr. in November is because everybody in South Texas loathes Craddick and Solly's opponent will definitely join the "Craddick Ranks" and become an a avid Craddick supporter.
--
Posted by Jaime Kenedeño to Texas State Representative House District 33 at 8/22/2006 03:30:00 AM
--
Kenedeno & Associates
9:14 PM
Jaime Kenedeño said...
Thank You Paul,
You have single handedly united the South Texas Democrats with the exception of a small faction. At least with respect to HD #33.
Good JOB!
10:45 PM
Tejana Dem said...
Your arrogance is undeniable. But thanks for the history lesson and for referencing Ronald Reagan's influence in the current political climate. What the hell does that have to do with anything? It still doesn't change the fact that my comment, posted before lunchtime today, has yet to surface on the oh-so-important Burka blog. Your criticism of Texas Democrats are nothing new and it has all been said before ad nauseum. I stand by my earlier points:
- your insinuation was that Congressman Ortiz employed some sort of strong-arm patron style politics to get Sol nominated in HD 33 was a tad bit racist and highly inaccurate, and in the same breath you claimed it such a narrow victory that
- the Democratic precinct chairs are in such a rift in HD 33 that it will lead to a loss of that seat.
Furthermore, I also gather that you choose not to comment on your scorn for "Liberal D's" who dare object to the deep budget cuts that gutted public education, Health & Human Services and other tax revenue dependant programs that Vilma Luna green lighted as Vice Chair of Appropriations, a member or Calendars and Ways & Means under the Republican leadership. What she doesn't get - and obviously you don't either is that it's about people, Burka. Your perpetuation of the terms "moderate" and "liberal" to describe votes and policies that victimize the most vulnerable Texans are as lazy as it gets. If you're so damn smart, you wouldn't attempt to use the HD 33 race as proof of "partisan cleansing" and the further downfall of the Democratic Party. We sure the hell do want to rid the party of people who care more about their careers and the political favors they enjoy when they sell out their constituents.
10:50 PM
Anonymous said...
"Tejana dem" calls Luna's chairing a major committee and serving in several other big-time jobs in the Legislature caring "about her career"...it actually made her one of the most powerful Tejanas in Texas. What is the commenters problem with that? How is it that Republicans can work with a Democrat majority, but the other way around is called "selling out their constituents?"
12:58 PM
Paul Burka said...
Tejana -- I do not know why your previous comment did not post. I never censor letters except for obscenities.
Otherwise, I will only say that yours is a typical left-wing rant: playing the race card and accusing those who disagree with you of not caring about people. Thanks for proving my point.
1:03 PM
Anonymous said...
This is obscene. EVERYBODY knows it's Bush's fault. WHat more do we need than Bush hatred? Policy? We don't need no steekin policy! WE HATE BUSH.
C'mon, say it with me
WE HATE BUSH! If it wasn't for BUsh there would be no "global warming", the Isrealite's would be having Thanksgiving dinner with Bin Laden, we would have national health care and a guaranteed minimum income.
2:16 PM
el_longhorn said...
Good post, Burka. But the Dems won't listen. They need Lloyd Doggett or someone with cred in the left wing to tell them the same thing. Maybe then the Democratic Party will pick itself up off the floor, dust itself off, roll up its sleeves and get to work on real legislative and policy issues. Who will be the Democratic leader that speaks truth to power??
3:57 PM
Beverly said...
"Only when they accept that what the Republicans really stole was the intellectual initiative"????
You call the "Southern Strategy" of the Nixon, Reagan, et als,
"intellectual initiative"?
Isn't this the opposite of playing the race card, when you do not admit the the Democrats support of Civil Rights, and the Republicans courting of southern racists have led to the R's domination of elected office?
12:17 PM
Anonymous said...
Beverly, of course he doesn't. Maybe he is one of those southern closet rascists who comprise the rank and file Republican party. If you notice, despite how many words, he could not refute one word that the allegedly "vitri" blogger wrote. It was just a big empty filibuster. Now, I would not have said it the same, but to deny that our high court belongs in 1930's era Germany, that Bushies inept response to Katrina was not based on race, that the Bushies have not caused the whole Muslim world to hate us, or to laughingly cite Hoover and Heritage as leaders, much less thinkers, is breathtaking. But who really cares what Burka thinks.
We will win this fall if we stick to the Lamont message. Unfortunately, John Kerry abandoned this is 2004, and the world continues to suffer for that monumental error. We are up in every contested Senate race, and will probably win the House, including a very Republican congressional seat in Houston. Of course, we win the "obscure" Corpus Christi seat - possibly two there. Our lead will only get wider with Iraq and the collapsing economy. This is deja vu 1986 and 1994. Burka is really running scared.
6:27 PM
Anonymous said...
The fact that you will not publish my blog is evidence of Republican, that means your too, fear of this November.
We will take the U.S. House and Senate, so lay down and enjoy it.
6:41 PM
Anonymous said...
good grief..."Bushies make the Muslim world hate us"? The Muslim world has hated Jews and Christians since c. 600 AD.....and advances on the western world whenever they feel strong enough. Read some history.
4:44 PM
So Solly
The District 33 (Corpus Christi) blog is back in session. I was part of a small group who met today with Solomon Ortiz Jr., the Democratic nominee to replace Vilma Luna and the subject of much commentary from readers (see "Split Decision," below). He has scads of boyish charm and yet manages to come across as low-key and humble: a born politician. A couple of supporters, one a political consultant and the other Jaime Capelo, a former legislator from Corpus Christi, accompanied him. Among the subjects discussed:
* Why the battle for the nomination with educator Danny Noyola was so close. (Ortiz won the votes of 23 precinct chairs to 20 for Noyola to fill the vacancy created when Luna withdrew from the race): Because influential trial lawyer Mikal Watts used all his powers of persuasion in backing Noyola.
* Whether the disgruntled Noyola faction can split the Democrats in November and deliver votes to Joe McComb, the Republican candidate: Ortiz's friends said that the Noyola crowd has only "this much" support (thumb and forefinger held apart slightly).
* Whether McComb can raise enough money to win. No, said Ortiz's friends. They'll cut off his money from Austin.
* Whether the race will be close: No. Ortiz will get 60 percent of the vote, said one of the friends. Two hot local races, for county judge and for sherriff, will assure a large Democratic turnout.
I still think Ortiz has to watch his back side. Noyola remains a problem, and whether Ortiz can cut off McComb's Republican money is questionable. What I didn't know before today is that Ortiz is a formidable candidate with a lot of political skill. He is the favorite to win--but I also felt that way yesterday.
Now, can we talk about something else?
posted by Paul Burka
Post a Comment